Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Private
166481
None assigned Waterloo, IA 50701
9.9
8913-33-376-012
42.469657 / -92.390450
2
Morris, Jennifer
Morris.Jennifer@epa.gov
913-551-7341


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Waterloo, City of BF97731101IAAssessment2011
Waterloo, City of BF97731201IAAssessment2011


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$2,800.0009/11/201309/24/2013Waterloo, City of YFY14
Phase II Environmental Assessment$7,600.0003/13/201404/08/2014Waterloo, City of N


Is Cleanup Necessary? No
EPA Assessment Funding: $10,400.00
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $10,400.00


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


Chromium (Cr)
Lead
Other Metals
Petroleum Products
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
Ground Water
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented:
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: 9.9
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
A property-specific institutional control (e.g., environmental covenant or deed restriction) may be desired to minimize any chance of long-term exposure to identified groundwater contaminants should the Black Hawk County ordinance change in the future.
No
No
No


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

Start DateLeveraged FundingCACompletion Date
12/05/2018$1,750,000.00Waterloo, City of 02/21/2020
04/05/2018$1,465,020.00Waterloo, City of 11/15/2018


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

Phase II ESA findings and conclusions are summarized as follows: � Range 1 Soil: Several RCRA metals detected in Range 1 soil at SB9 below Statewide Standards. ? Range 2 Soil: No VOCs detected in Range 2 soil above laboratory reporting limits (RLs). Several TEHs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals detected in Range 2 soil below the Statewide Standards. ? Groundwater: Several TEHs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals and acetone detected in groundwater below Statewide Standards. Further, waste oil and barium at SB7, chromium at SB3, and lead at SB2, SB3, SB6 and SB7 detected above Protected Groundwater Statewide Standards. Lead in groundwater at SB3 detected above the Non-Protected Groundwater Statewide Standard. ? Vapor Intrusion: The compounds that exceeded Statewide Standards in soil and groundwater on the Subject Property are not sufficiently volatile to pose a vapor intrusion risk. Further, there are no structures currently located on the Subject Property. Black Hawk County has an ordinance (Health Dept. Regulation 1-99) that requires a mandatory connection to public water, preventing the installation of new wells. Further, no wells identified on the Subject Property during the Phase I ESA. Based on this information the groundwater ingestion pathway appears to be severed. For redevelopment of the Subject Property, a property-specific institutional control (e.g., environmental covenant or deed restriction) may be desired to further minimize any chance of long-term exposure to identified groundwater contaminants, should the Black Hawk County ordinance change in the future. Redevelopment plans for the Subject Property will include the construction of structures. However, based on the findings of this report the vapor intrusion pathway does not appear to pose a risk to future development as none of the compounds detected above the Statewide Standards are sufficiently volatile to be of concern. Asbestos containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) inspections were not completed on the site due to the limited access to the fill material in the subsurface on the Subject Property. However, impact from lead contamination was not observed in soil on the Subject Property. If future plans include the removal of the fill material on the subject property, testing of the material for ACM should be completed during the removal activities. This approach may allow for the fill to be tested in sections so that if ACM is found section the removal for ACM can be isolated to the section(s) where it was encountered, minimizing the disposal of material as ACM. QEP recommended no further action at this time.

Former Use: Historical records depict agricultural uses on the property from 1937-1979. The property had illegal dumping activities occur on-site from approximately 1983-1994 before being permitted as a "rubble site" from 1994-1998. The property is currently a vacant lot.
Greenspace (9.9)
Hazardous & Petroleum


Top of Page