Skip to Main Content

Breadcrumb

References

Reference Details

Citation
Yu et al 2020
Author
Yu, J., Nickerson, A., Li, Y., Fang, Y., and Strathmann, T.J.
Title
Fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during hydrothermal liquefaction of municipal wastewater treatment sludge.
Source
Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
Publication Year
2020
Reference Category
Primary Sources
Reference Type
Peer Reviewed Journals
Source Details
DOI: 10.1039/c9ew01139k
DOI
10.1039/c9ew01139kExit
Non-Targeted Analysis Flag
No

Scope

Open Scope
Treatment Process
Scale
Matrix
Matrix DetailScope Detail
Open ScopeHydrothermal TreatmentLabOtherWater spiked with PFOSPercent degradation and percent defluorination of 5 PFAS for various combinations of time and temperature
Open ScopeHydrothermal TreatmentLabSludgeWastewater sludge spiked with PFOSPercent degradation and percent defluorination of 5 PFAS for various combinations of time and temperature; distribution (partitioning to aqueous, solid, and biocrude oil phases) of undegraded PFAS (5 compounds) for various combinations of time and temperature

Condition

Thermal Treatment Results

Link to Results Record
Analyte
Scope
Condition
Effectiveness (%)
Initial Concentration
Post Concentration
Offgas Concentration
Additional Details
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute25% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute95% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute20% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute40% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute98% Results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 260 °C | 60 minute 0% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 300 °C | 60 minute 0% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 30 minute 30% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 60 minute 93% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
7:3 FTCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 90 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute17% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute42% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute48% Results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 260 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 300 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 30 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
8:2 FTUCAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 90 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute17% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute38% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute20% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute25% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute10% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute61% Results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 260 °C | 60 minute 26% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 300 °C | 60 minute 49% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 30 minute 50% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 60 minute 52% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
FtS 8:2Hydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 90 minute 66% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute18% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute30% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute13% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute>99% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 260 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 300 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 30 minute 98% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 60 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOAHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 90 minute >99% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 260 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 300 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Other 350 °C | 60 minute0% Results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 260 °C | 60 minute 39% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 300 °C | 60 minute 35% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 2
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 30 minute 7% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 60 minute 46% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
PFOSHydrothermal Treatment | Lab | Sludge 350 °C | 90 minute 33% 1000 ng/gNanograms contaminant per gram of solids sludge; results interpreted from Figure 3
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on October 15, 2024.